In today’s Islamic immigration-invasion of Europe, a building permit for a mosque may be as valuable as a bomber squadron in an earlier war.

Indirect aggression through demographic warfare is the current game plan to establish Eurabia building by building, block by block, by hostile Muslim immigrants who intend to turn Europe into dar al-Islam, under a worldwide Islamic government.

Keep in mind that a 2006 poll found 40 percent of Muslims residing in Britain want sharia law there, so the writing is on the wall for all to see.

A recent battle took place in a council meeting in Clitheroe.

CLITHEROE, England — On a chilly night this winter, this pristine town in some of Britain’s most untouched countryside voted to allow a former Christian church to become a mosque.

The narrow vote by the municipal authorities marked the end of a bitter struggle by the tiny Muslim population to establish a place of worship, one that will put a mosque in an imposing stone Methodist church that had been used as a factory since its congregation dwindled away 40 years ago.

The battle underscored Britain’s unease with its Muslim minority, and particularly the infiltration of terrorist cells among the faithful, whose devotion has challenged an increasingly secular Britain’s sense of itself.
[British town votes to change a church to a mosque, International Herald Tribune 4/1/07]

Below: Sheraz Arshad at Mount Zion Methodist Church in Clitheroe, England.

However, apparently all is not completely lost in Britain. In the town of Dudley, the locals are fighting back. The council there voted down a proposal to build a mosque from scratch, because the scheme had “provoked widespread opposition.”

The Dudley resistance is encouraging to see, but where is the British version of the Minutemen?

On February 14, Brenda Walker wrote

An off-duty policeman shot and killed 18-year-old Sulejman Talovic, so his motivations may never be known. But there is no doubt he went to the mall prepared to kill as many people as possible.[Refugee Rampage in Salt Lake]

I see that Srdja Trifkovic wrote a month later in Chronicles that we more or less do know his motivation now.

Utah Shootings: Yet Another Case of Sudden Jihad Syndrome, After All

Five weeks after the shooting spree by a 19-year old Bosnian Muslim, Sulejman Talovic, left five people dead and four wounded in a Salt Lake City shopping mall, the authorities claim to be clueless about his motives. The mainstream media, as our readers may recall, were quick to blame the Serbs for Talovic’s alleged early-childhood traumas that supposedly caused him to crack. (They even interviewed a Bosnian jihadi veteran to make that point.) From what we now know about the case, however, it appears that the rampage in Utah was yet another “lone wolf” attack by a Muslim-as-Muslim—in other words, yet another outbreak of the deadly sudden jihad syndrome (SJS) that is erupting across America with increasing regularity.

There’s a lot more,(Read The Whole Thing) but it’s pretty clear that the late Sulejman Talovic was motivated by a desire to kill any non-Muslims handy.

It amazes me that the press and the authorities keep trying for alternative explanations to Sudden Jihad Syndrome. I’ll mention just two: Pim Fortuyn’s killer was long said to be an animal rights nut, reacting to a side issue in the Fortuyn campaign.

It turns out that when he spoke in court, a year later, he was actually an immigration rights nut, who’d killed Fortuyn because the repeated demonization of immigration restrictionists led him to believe that Fortuyn was a theat to “Weaker groups in society.”

That’s not only evil, it’s stupid. Moslems are a stronger group in Dutch society.

But apparently, the Dutch police didn’t want to say that he’d killed in the cause of Open Borders.

The same mindless searching for alternatives to Islam as the motive for the killings appeared in the Hadayet case in 2002, in which a Muslim immigrant entrepreneur shot up the El Al counter at the Los Angeles International airport. Typical headlines included.

FBI still searching for motive in LA airport shooting By Sandra Marquez, The Associated Press (07-08-02)

Egyptian’s motives in LAX shooting still a mystery, CNN.com, July 6, 2002

Morons. Nine months later, the FBI finally admitted that it was Islamic terrorism. Did I say two? I just remembered another one, almost ten years old.

GAZA CITY - Ali Abu Kamal’s relatives say they are tired of lying about why the Palestinian opened fire on the observation deck of Empire State Building, killing a tourist and injuring six other people before committing suicide.

The New York Times reported that there had been no suspected political inkage.Riehl World View: Ali Abu Kamal’s Attack Was Terrorism

The bottom line is that when a Muslim kills people because he’s a Muslim, both the press and police don’t want to say so.

Below, Tessa Tranchant, 16, left, and Allison Kunhardt, 17, were killed late Friday.

According to grieving father Ray Tranchant, his daughter Tessa and her best friend Allison Kunhardt, “were just sitting at the light, strapped in their seat belts. They were just doing what they were supposed to be doing.”

But obeying the law is not enough protection any more, since drunk-driving illegal aliens are making the roads a far more hazardous place. The accused, illegal alien Alfredo Ramos, was apparently so blotto that he doesn’t even remember the accident.

Afterward, [Ramos] told him he had no memory of the crash. He learned from authorities that he had killed two people, his brother said.

Ramos, who was born in Mexico of Guatemalan parents, has been in the United States for about seven years.
[Suspect in crash that killed 2 had alcohol-related convictions, Hampton Roads Pilot 4/3/07]

Ramos had a prior DUI conviction in Chesapeake this year, so if Rep. Sue Myrick’s Scott Gardner Act had been law, he would have been immediately deported for being a drunk-driving illegal alien. The legislation, originally written in 2005, has been resubmitted in this Congress as HR1355.

The girls were very close friends, known to finish each other’s sentences. Tessa’s mom Colette called the two “inseparable.” They were outgoing, fun-loving and had many friends. It’s a terrible tragedy that their lives ended so young, and that the accident could have been prevented if Washington were doing its job of maintaining secure borders.

This story appears on the face of it to be a genuine asylum case, with credible “credible fear.”

ABC7Chicago.com: Congolese couple granted asylum by Chicago immigration judge

AP

April 2, 2007 (MILWAUKEE) - A Congolese couple fighting to remain in the United States were granted asylum today by an immigration judge in Chicago, ending years of fear and uncertainty.
David and Regina Bakala broke into tears today upon hearing the judge’s decision.

But why is the United States the only place they can go? Years ago, I suggested that if the US had too many refugees, perhaps Mexico would like some. I hear that there are some vacancies in Mexico. The article was titled “Dear Mr. Fox: Please Find Attached our Poor/ Tired/ Dispossessed, Etc..”

If the Mexican government doesn’t believe immigration is beneficial, we could direct them to the Cato Institute, which has already translated its open borders propaganda into Spanish.