19 July 2007

Shocked, Shocked, At ImmigrationProf Blog

Kevin R. Johnson, (send him mail), writes at ImmigrationProf Blog

July 19, 2007
Tancredo Wants to Reduce LEGAL, as well as Illegal, Immigration

Rep. Tom Tancredo recently introduced an immigration proposal. According to the Rocky Mountain News (here), Tommy T’s big proposal includes “reduc[ing] the number of legal immigrants to the US by two-thirds …”

KJ

You would think that a professor specializing in immigration would be familiar with the arguments for reduced legal immigration,(Alien Nation wasn’t about illegal immigration) and would know that Tancredo introduced a bill for a complete immigration moratorium in 2003.

Xenophobia For Multiculturalists

Kathy Shaidle at relapsedcatholic.com writes The only people never accused of “Islamophobia”… are the ones who really do fear Islam.

I’m not afraid of radical Islam because I’m ignorant. I hate radical Islam because I know so much about it.

So strictly speaking, I can’t be “Islamophobic.”

Who does fear radical Islam, though? Cowardly reporters who court terrorists then convert at gunpoint. Every newspaper that refused to run the Danish cartoons. Mealy-mouthed politicians of all parties. School teachers, bureaucrats and other eager appeasers.

What all these people have in common is their fear of Islam — and the fact they are NEVER accused of “Islamophobia.”

Here’s what I’d like to know–is it us at VDARE.com, or Linda Chavez and the Wall Street Journal who are the xenophobes? They’re the ones who are afraid of an unstoppable Hispanic powerhouse that Americans will have to adapt to–we’re the ones talking about fighting back.

Democrats Side with Terrorists

Just when you think the Democrats have stooped the lowest they can possibly go (i.e. enthusiastic support for illegal alien amnesty for tens of millions, including terrorists and criminal gang members), they defy common sense, morality and national security to go lower. Apparently the Ds want to allow Muslims to sue Americans who speak up in good faith to authorities when they see an activity that looks like it might be terrorism.

Remember how the Flying Imams are suing individual American passengers who blew the whistle on them for suspicious behavior. Of course, it is not the passengers’ call as to who is booted from a flight; it is the captain who decides when the plane is in the air and the police on the ground. The imams’ lawsuit is an undisguised threat against citizens, telling them to keep quiet if they see a Muslim doing something that looks criminally threatening — or they will be sued by deep-pocketed Islamist supporters.

Democrats are trying to pull a provision from a homeland security bill that will protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that may lead to a terrorist attack, according to House Republican leadership aides.

The legislation, which moves to a House and Senate conference committee this afternoon, will implement final recommendations from the 911 Commission.

Rep. Pete King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Rep. Steve Pearce, New Mexico Republican, sponsored the bill after a group of Muslim imams filed a lawsuit against U.S. Airways and unknown or “John Doe” passengers after they were removed for suspicious behavior aboard Flight 300 from Minneapolis to Phoenix on Nov. 20 before their removal.
[Democrats want 'John Doe' provision cut Washington Times 7/19/07]

Muslim immigration, which includes the intention on the part of some of eventually turning the US into an Islamic country, is accompanied with cultural intimidation of the sort exemplified the politics of this legislation, where citizen protection has been gutted. The Democrats are only increasing the belief among the public that they are weak on national security by such pandering to hostile Islamic interests.

Furthermore, the recent news about the National Intelligence Estimate’s conclusion that we are increasingly endangered by another massive attack makes citizen awareness and willingness to speak up more important than ever.

This just in: Rep Roy Blunt’s press release on the King provision being pulled…

“National security in a post-9/11 world requires the constant vigilance of the American people, and the courage to stand up and report activity they deem to be unusual or suspicious. That Democrats in the House and Senate would seek to strip a provision protecting Americans from being sued for discharging these important duties is deeply troubling — and is something Republicans in the House will not abide.

The most recent report from Fox News TV is that the language protecting concerned citizens has not been reinserted during the meeting of the conference committee on the bill, despite a public outcry.

Undeported Sex Offender And Zina Linnik Suspect Charged With 50 Plus Counts Of Child Rape

Michelle Malkin has details. Here’s what I wrote about it earlier:Murder Of Zina Linnik And The Undeported Alien Sex Offender.

Iraqi Refugees Worry Mayor

There are couple of things this brings to mind, the first being that the Mayor may get in trouble for worrying, the way the Mayor of Lewiston, Maine did when he opposed mass Somalian Immigration, and the other is, of course, are some of these the young men of military age who should be at home fighting for their country, instead of coming to America while Americans are fighting over there, or as John Derbyshire put it in the New English Review, Please Go Fight for My Country So I Can Take Your Job.

Iraqi refugees’ arrival worries Warren mayor

Christina Stolarz / The Detroit News
July 18, 2007

WARREN — Mayor Mark Steenbergh expressed concerns on the city’s Web site today over the possibility of “thousands” of Iraqi refugees moving into the city, saying they could strain services and educational resources.

Steenbergh states in a blog message that the Macomb County Planning Department informed the city to anticipate the imminent arrival of 90 Iraqi refugees, with more to come. But it’s unknown when the refugees will arrive.