Shawn Pogatchinik writes at Associated Press:

Almost all the children who could not find elementary school places in a Dublin suburb this year were black, the government said Monday, highlighting Ireland’s problems integrating its increasingly diverse population.

Now, we learn a little later on how Ireland came to have a substantial black population:

More than 25,000 Africans have settled in Ireland since the mid-1990s. Most arrived as asylum seekers, and many took advantage of Ireland’s law — unique in Europe — of granting citizenship to parents of any Irish-born child. Voters toughened that law in a 2004 referendum.

Now, the prevalence of Irish racism is especially interesting given the demands recent Irish immigrants have made in the US-and the important role the Irish-heritage Kennedy family have had in creating the immigration policies in the US.

I personally think that the decent thing for the Irish government to do would be to offer buy out the citizenship rights of these families-so they had a reasonable chance to establish themselves someplace else. These families have made a substantial investment to establish themselves in Ireland-and it doesn’t appear they are really being received as equals.

I really don’t think there is anything close to the political will necessary to establish Ireland as a true multi-cultural or multi-ethnic state. A friend of mine of Scottish descent traveled to Ireland and found when he went into a “Catholic” pub, that he was ‘encouraged’ to take his business to the Protestant pub down the street-and Scots are an “immigrant” group that has been in Ireland for hundreds of years!

The Irish government could just come clean and admit they admitted some immigrants that they weren’t really prepared to integrate into their society–and help these folks get on with their lives in someplace where they can get the full range of services they need and deserve.

The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Heidi Beirich disapproves of a syndicated column by Pat Buchanan, posted not only here [The Washington Post And The Color Of Crime August 20, 2007]and on his own website, as she says, but on Townhall.com, WorldNetDaily, Human Events, Yahoo News, and the Manchester Union-Leader.

What you get here and not elsewhere is the links, especially to anything he quotes, and to any report he refers to, which in this case included the 2005 Color Of Crime report from American Renaissance, which is the thing that has Heidi upset.

Pat Buchanan Again Cites Racist Sources on Black Crime

Posted in Media Extremism, White Supremacist, Hate Groups by Heidi Beirich on August 22, 2007

MSNBC commentator and former Reagan aide Pat Buchanan is citing racist sources again — and mislabeling them as “right-leaning.”

In “The Color of Crime,” an Aug. 21 column posted on his blog and the white nationalist hate site vdare.com, Buchanan attacked The Washington Post for not telling the truth about black criminality in two different stories about race and crime (here and here). Buchanan was incensed that the Post did not say that blacks are more criminal than whites and didn’t mention “white victims” of black crime.

To make his point, Buchanan cited approvingly a report by the white supremacist New Century Foundation, “The Color of Crime: Race, Crime and Justice in America”, which purportedly proves that blacks are vastly more criminal than others. Buchanan uses this racist “research” to attack blacks, writing, “The real repository of racism in America — manifest in violent interracial assault, rape and murder — is to be found not in the white community, but the African-American community.”

As an article in the Intelligence Report pointed out seven years ago, that argument is fundamentally flawed, ignoring decades of real research that shows that poverty is intimately related to crime rates. In fact, race, unlike income, has little, if any, predictive value. The New Century article also conflates interracial crime with interracial hate crime to claim blacks commit vastly more hate crimes than others.

Of course, I’m sure Pat would have been happy to quote a neutral study conducted under the auspices of Harvard University, or a similar study conducted by the Urban Institute–any such study would come to the same conclusions, using the official figures supplied by the FBI and the Department of Justice. But these studies aren’t being made. There seems to be no funding for them.

The SPLC’s seven-year-old article, (which obviously has no bearing on the 2005 Color Of Crime report) claimed that poverty is “intimately related to crime rates.” So it is, in the sense that crime doesn’t pay, and a life of crime is almost a guarantee of poverty–not being able to get credit or hold a job, because of incarceration, et cetera.

However, the same habits and attitudes that make people poor are also the ones that make them criminals. And in both categories, African-Americans are overrepresented, in spite of forty years of discrimination in their favor. Japanese-Americans, by contrast, both thrived and refrained from crime even when they were oppressed.

These are facts that are obvious to every taxi driver, and it would be better to try and produce cogent argument against them rather than worrying about “tainted sources.”

You can comment at the SPLC’s “Hatewatch” blog.