You can listen by going here or by clicking on the Player below. (If your browser has Flash enabled.) You should be able to call in with your questions.

Call one of these numbers, depending on your own area code–The Show ID Number is 237814.

1) 213-8396521
2) 303-747-5121
3) 305-433-6998
4) 401-427-0072
5) 480-588-2619
6) 503-334-2062
7) 541-665-8822
8 ) 702-357-4623
9) 714-706-1622
10) 732-903-9933
11) 775-339-0122
12) 813-792-4426
13) 863-589-1187
14) 908-498-0485
15) 954-880-9162

Former Presidente Vicente Fox has pried himself away from his deluxe rancho and is stalking the lucrative US marketplace, hawking his new book. Naturally he is full of trash talk about the Americans who foiled his open-border scam.

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox said Monday that the United States is letting racism dictate its policies, especially when it comes to immigration.

“The xenophobics, the racists, those who feel they are a superior race … they are deciding the future of this nation,” he said, without naming names, in an interview with The Associated Press.
[Ex-Mexico Prez: Racists Stop Immigration, Google AP 10/9/07]

Did Fox forget about his countrymen in La Raza (”The Race” in Spanish), which is noted for its reconquista goals?

Let us not forget the colorful Mexica fascists who say white Americans should be forced to move to Europe. And MEChA student group, whose motto is “Everything for the race. Everything outside the race, nothing.”

In addition, a court of law determined last year that Mexican gangs conspired to drive black Americans out of northeast Los Angeles.

The racist here wears a sombrero. Shut your tortilla hole, Vicente.

The former Presidente probably revealed more than he meant to during an interview on Larry King (read the transcript). Not only did he affirm that he and George Bush colluded on the North American Union, including the Amero becoming US currency, he bragged on how wealthy Mexico is:

Mexico’s seventh largest trading economy in the world. Mexico trades more products and services than all of Latin America together, including Brazil, Argentina and all of them.

Say, if Mexico is doing so well, then why are millions of its citizens fleeing illegally to the north where they are unwanted and despised?

Watch a YouTube clip of Fox explaining his North American Union agreement with George Bush.

I’m hoping for a nice long book tour!

Why this is news, I don’t know. This comes from Kansas City Star reporter Steve Penn, (e-mail) recently dealt with here by Dave Gorak. (The piece starts “There was a time when a big brother would be in hot water back home if he didn’t stick up for his little sister outside the house. No such scolding will be necessary for Ramon Murguia. Murguia is the big brother of Janet Murguia, the chief executive officer of the National Council of La Raza, …” Gag. Ack. Thbbbt. )The reason I mention it is that it came to me in an SPLC Nativist News email, and it sounds like the kind of rhetoric that, if it came from someone supporting immigration law enforcement, would be called paranoid hatemongering:

“We know what’s going on, and we’re going to stand up to it,” Ramon Murguia said. “We’re going to stand up for the families who are being scapegoats for this organization.

“They’re not just after the undocumented in our community. They’re going after all of us Latinos. And we’re not going to take it.”www.kansascity.com | 10/03/2007 | Family makes a forceful stand together

This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

I wonder if Britain and Japan both benefited from being “offshore islanders” (the title of Paul Johnson’s idiosyncratic and fascinating 1972 history of England, back when he was a leftist patriot). The stability of Britain is quite remarkable — there are old deeds and other legal documents still on file from many centuries past, ready to be consulted if a question of exactly where the boundary of a piece of property rests. Perhaps not being invaded since 1066 meant the evolution (whether cultural or genetic) of middle class traits could proceed quickest there because the settled distribution of property allowed for fair competition.

A reader in what has been, more than anywhere else, the crossroads of the world–Istanbul–writes in response to my review of Gregory Clark’s A Farewell to Alms that living in the historic center of all the action has its downside:

As erudite as Max Weber and his theory of the Protestant work ethic is (maybe; haven’t read him much other than in short extracts), he seems he was lacking a very crucial, fatally crucial model for social science: the Darwinist paradigm of game-theoretic racing/survival conditions.

Somebody has to whisper in the ears of modern social “scientists” with their confused paradigms: it’s not that religion suddenly got hold of Europeans–the religion which Freud wrongly identified as the suppression of natural desires to create a neurotic bourgeois personality–and the “stifling” work ethic was born and thus capitalism.

It’s that the “beta” layers of society who already had “religion” in their genes, and therefore were not “neurotic” or “oppressed” or anything by it, who therefore had the right attitude for creating prosperity–a combination of thriftiness, mutual respect of rights, cooperativeness, hard work, and tons of creativity–outlasted the rest of the suckers who ate or killed themselves out of the gene pool.

This itself can explain the root causes of practically all the problems that the rest of us suckers are suffering from. To you, an American, it may be rather hypothetical, but to me, as a “turd” worlder, it is crystal clear: if we had these qualities only at twice the present levels, you’d see us reach Korean levels of productivity. But, alas, as the ultimate dumping ground of every imaginable race around the old world, as the crossroads where every bully ethny that got to be anybody met with each other, as the genetic junkyard of practically the last two millennia, we didn’t stand a chance, did we?

Isolation? What isolation? Never heard of the word before, sir!

The Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case between President Bush and his home state (and mine!), Texas, regarding the execution of a Mexican convicted of the brutal rape and murder of two young girls. [Supreme Court case pits Bush against Texas over death penalty for Mexican, AP, October 7, 2007]

Gang member and illegal alien, Jose Ernesto Medellin participated in the gang-rape and strangulation of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena, ages 14 and 16. When their bodies were found four days later, Medellin was arrested and read his Miranda rights, but…not informed of his ability to seek aid from the Mexican consulate under the Vienna Convention.

According to the Administration, “The president does not agree with the International Court of Justice’s interpretation of the Vienna Convention”. Nevertheless, Bush is citing it in an attempt to undermine the Texas justice system.

You have to wonder: why? Is Bush really, as Brenda Walker has suggested, The MexiChurian Candidate?

Nadler is the guy who wrote Immigration Losers: A new study shows the heavy price the GOP paid for “get-tough” border politics,[WSJ, October 2 2007]–the article that Ramesh Ponnuru liked.
He’s also the guy who wrote a piece in NRO claiming, one more time, that Bush got 44 percent of the Hispanic vote, which I keep trying to tell people is a landslide the other way. It’s not easy to get a letter published in the WSJ, but Hayworth managed it. Read the whole thing–it’s free.

Combine that historical pattern with the dwindling popularity of President Bush in 2006, and Mitt Romney’s inverse sports analogy rings true: “Voters couldn’t fire the coach, so they fired some of the players!”

In Arizona’s Fifth District, my electoral defeat came not from my advocacy of “enforcement first,” but from the voters’ frustration that our immigration laws were not being enforced. My opponent successfully exploited that frustration, paying lip service to enforcement in his television ads with the poll tested phrase, “We must secure the border!”Historical Revisionism on Immigration Issue - WSJ.com

Q. How do you know it’s Autumn?

A. When the media starts its annual round of credulous stories about how crops are going to rot in the fields because of not enough cheap illegal alien labor so we need a bigger Guest Peasant program to alleviate the looming shortage/crisis.

NorCal Farmers: ‘We Don’t Have Enough Workers’
Produce May Rot In Fields

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Farmers in and around the Bay Area are starting to feel the pinch from tighter border security and visa requirements, NBC11’s Daniel Garza reported Monday. Some farmers told Garza they expect some of their fields to remain unpicked. Some said they believe their fields will end up filled with rotting produce. The Bush administration has learned of the possible loss of millions of dollars for thousands of farmers throughout the country, and is attempting to loosen visa requirements for workers.

I took a comprehensive look at this genre of annual news story exactly one year ago today in VDARE.com during the Great Pear Crisis of 2006: “Pearanoia.” As you have no doubt noticed, nobody in America has eaten a pear in over a year. Larry Ellison bought the last pear in the world at a Sotheby’s auction in June and keeps it on display in a crystal vault at Oracle headquarters.