10 April 2008

“Welcome to Beijing!” (Sino Francisco, Actually)

Parts of San Francisco were awash in a sea of Red China flags Wednesday, as friends of the Peoples’ Republic showed up in force to celebrate the homeland’s rise to power on the occasion of the Olympic torch run. The vibe toward dissenters was not friendly.

[Kai] Sang, a Tibetan from Minnesota, who had done nothing more than stand with a friend wearing a “Free Tibet” shirt, was surrounded by critics. A woman shouted at her, “You know nothing!” and “Go to Tibet to see for yourself.”

“They put pressure on us,” said Sang, who looked like a soccer mom. “They try to get us to push them, but we are nonviolent. We are not against the Olympics. They should hold the Olympics. But we are speaking for people who do not have a voice.”

At that moment, the China supporters seemed to think that they’d carried the day. The “Free Tibet” crowd had been harassed to the point that they packed up and walked toward the Ferry Building. It appeared that the torch would be coming down the street any minute, and the news photos and video would feature thousands and thousands of cheering China supporters waving red flags.

A cocky young man walked past me and read his sign out loud, “Welcome to Beijing,” he said.
[Pro-China crowds attempt to stifle dissenters, San Francisco Chronicle, April 10, 2008]

Below, only one American flag, among a sea of red, indicated the location of the Olympic torch event.

There are literally thousands of comments about the event in various articles and coverage in the Chronicle’s online home, SFGate.com. Quite a few are pro-China propaganda, written in poor English. I read a couple hundred, and not a one mentioned the lebensraum aspect of China’s takeover of Tibet: in Lhasa, the capital city, the majority of the population is Han Chinese.

What you do read is a lot of adoration for the Chinese homeland from people who immigrated to the United States of their own volition. There is very little resembling loyalty or gratitude toward their adopted country to be found in the online comments. These “Chinese abroad” are a potential fifth column, and some in sensitive positions have already taken that step by spying for Red China, like the recently sentenced Chi Mak and other PRC loyalists.

See Friendly Appeasement: Chinese-American “Committee Of 100” Seeks Accommodation with Beijing for more about the “global Chinese” — with emphasis on “Chinese.”

Someone should tell these immigrants that the majority of the American people still expect old-fashioned cultural assimilation, including loyalty.

Atheism And Multiculturalism

Ann Althouse highlights a quote from Martin Amis’s latest book:“Since it is no longer permissible to disparage any single faith or creed, let us start disparaging all of them.” and says that this “explains the recent atheism fad, doesn’t it?.”

The quote is from Amis’s essay, The voice of the lonely crowd, [The Guardian, June 1, 2002] and she may have a point there–I suspect many writers wishing to hit out at violent Muslim fundamentalism feel a need to bash Christians as well, because obviously just disapproving of Muslims would be…racist.

In a related note, Kathy Shaidle says “As we continue to pray for [Christopher]Hitchens’ reception into the Catholic Church (and you just know that’s coming…)” we can delight in his attacks on the modern day preachers who consider themselves the heirs of Martin Luther King.

Stranger things have happened than Christopher Hitchens finding God, (I remember Chesterton’s Father Brown had a similar case) but not much stranger.

The Truth About Hillary

Have you noticed that most of the things you’ve been told over and over again about Hillary Clinton–how crafty, organized, and ruthless she is–have turned out not to be true?

  • Although they are pretty much tied in the primaries, Obama has beaten her like a drum in the caucuses, where organization and technical mastery of arcane rules matters most.
  • On her staff, the loyalists like former campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle, are incompetent. But her mercenaries, leakers, and backstabbers are also incompetent.
  • Yet, she hasn’t been ruthless at all in running against Obama. For example, the Rev. Wright DVDs were available for the whole world to buy from Rev. Wright’s church, but Hillary didn’t use them.

Rubenstein Report Available Online, Plus Media Reports And SPLC Attacks

There’s a report on the Ed Rubenstein’s immigration report in the

Report says immigration costly

By Hsin-Yin Lee

The Washington Times
April 9, 2008

More than 37 million immigrants in the United States, both legal and illegal, cost the federal government more than $346 billion last year, twice as much as the nation’s fiscal deficit, according to a report released yesterday.

“This is another nail in the coffin of economic growth,” said Edwin Rubenstein, director of research and president of ESR Research, which released the report. “There is absolutely no reason immigration policy shouldn’t be discussed on its economic merits.”[More]

It’s also mentioned in the Austin American-Statesman’s Borderline blog

Study: Immigrants cost each U.S. taxpayer $9,000

Immigrants — both legal and illegal — cost every American taxpayer more than $9,000, according to a study released Tuesday.

The study did not take into account taxes paid by the immigrants

I’m not sure what the mean by “didn’t take into account”--while some immigrants pay taxes, and some don’t, the poverty levels mean that they’re more likely to receive tax money.

The Austin-American Statesman linked to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s recommendation and linked to the SPLC’s attack on us

Immigration Report Being Released Today Linked to White Supremacists

by Mark Potok on April 8, 2008

Potok, who has attacked us before, as well as attacking other conservatives, and trying to make Sierra Club be in favor of immigration, classifies his blog under the following heads: Anti-Latino, Extremist Propaganda, Anti-Immigrant, Academic Racism, Media Extremism, Nativist Extremist, Hate Groups.

The SPLC, in my view, is some kind of weird cult, and their insistence that no report on immigration be mentioned without mentioning their opinion of us (“Linked to” means of course linked to by them) is as if we, in our turn should insist that no mention of the SPLC should refrain from mentioning the classic Harpers exposé The Church of Morrris Dees,| How the Southern Poverty Law Center profits from intolerance [November. 2000] or similar investigative reports from the Montgomery Advertiser and Birmingham News. See Save The Sierra Club From The Treason Lobby—Act Now! by Brenda Walker.

Today you don’t have to settle for what the media says that “a study has shown”–you can actually read the study itself in PDF:

The Fiscal Impact Of Immigration
An Analysis of the Costs to 15 Federal Separtments And AgenciesThe Social Contract

An Exclusive Report

By Edwin S. Rubenstein