According to Politico.com, Katie Couric said recently that

“I find myself in the last bastion of male dominance, and realizing what Hillary Clinton might have realized not long ago: that sexism in the American society is more common than racism, and certainly more acceptable or forgivable.”

This is a typical female reaction. (Just kidding!) But yes, considering that the population is divided 50-50 between men and women, conflicts based on gender probably are more common, especially since, outside of Massachusetts and San Francisco, most people are married to a member of the opposite sex, and you know how much trouble that causes.

But sexism, like racism, cuts both ways, and just as anti-white racism is commonly seen in universities and on TV,  so anti-male sexism, expressed in phrases like “Men Are Scum,“ is the kind of sexism you can get away with.

From Norm Matloff’s H-1B/L-1/offshoring e-newsletter.

Norm Matloff writes:

Seems like it’s one outrage after another these days. And the biggest outrage of all is that almost no one is reporting it.

No one except Lou Dobbs, that is. Though uttering his name in flattering terms won’t win one friends and help one influence people at a university faculty party, the fact is that these people are in denial. As Prof. Hira points out, H-1B and offshoring have come to epitomize the gradual–maybe I should say rapid–deterioration of our democracy.

As you will read below, India has tried to use the Doha Round of the WTO trade talks to slip in an unlimited worker visa, with no participation on the Hill at this point. If I recall correctly, the president no longer has fast-track trade authority, under which the Senate previoulsy could not vet trade agreements on a point-by-point basis, but still, it might be difficult to block something like this once approved by the negotiating parties.

The Dobbs show mentions NAFTA, but the history for this kind of thing goes even further back, to H-1B itself. The GATT supposedly forbids the U.S. from ever reducing the yearly H-1B cap below 65,000. Personally I don’t think the language says that, but the consensus in DC, even among critics of the H-1B program, is that it does. On the other hand, if the GATT is indeed binding, then guess what–it requires the U.S. to impose on ALL H-1B employers the restrictions currently applied only to the minuscule category of H-1B-dependent firms. In DC, one can have one’s cake and eat it too, as long as one is an industry lobbyist. See On The Need For Reform Of The H-1b Non-Immigrant Work Visa In Computer-Related Occupations[PDF]

By the way, I believe the special H-1B category for Singapore to get enacted, though the one for Chile was blocked after the Senate finally decided it politically wise to do so. See here.

Norm

LOU DOBBS: An outrageous effort tonight, trying to bring in more foreign labor at the expense of middle class workers. Free trade advocates in Geneva telling America to change our policy and raise the number of temporary workers allowed into our country. Bill Tucker has our report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BILL TUCKER, CNN CORRESPONDENT: (voice-over): Trade agreements and immigration policy wouldn’t seem to have much in common. But workers and jobs are apparently becoming just commodities to be traded. The latest round of trade within the World Trade Organization known as the Doha (ph) Round, India is pressing the United States to create a new guest worker visa for highly skilled workers, effectively skirting the cap on the H-1B Visa.

It is a demand that relatively few people outside of trade negotiators are aware of and one expert in outsourcing is horrified. RON HIRA, ROCHESTER INST. OF TECHNOLOGY: I just find it amazing and unbelieveable that — that we have this opaque and un-Democratic process set up. TUCKER (voice over): U.S. trade negotiators refused to discuss the details of any negotiations at this point. If a new type of visa were created, it wouldn’t be the first created by a trade agreement. In 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement created the T-N (ph) visa, allowing workers from Canada and Mexico to work in the United States indefinitely. And in virtually every trade agreement since, there has been a provision allowing guest workers into the United States under what’s known as trade and services. According to one group that lobbies for a more restricted immigration policy, such provisions benefit foreign companies that provide outsourcing services.

JESSICA VAUGHAN, CTR. FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: We’re giving concessions to companies, so that they can establish a trade foothold in the United States. not to hire Americans and benefit our economy, but to bring in workers from abroad

TUCKER: Sixty-eight hundred guest worker visas were part of the free trade agreement with Singapore and Chile.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

TUCKER (on camera): But those visas never made it into the final trade agreement (INAUDIBLE) because of a number of senators who were angry at the visas being included in the trade agreement, prompting a warning from several senators, Lou, against the inclusion of high skilled visas in trade agreements in the future. DOBBS: They need to take the Doha Round and square it off.

TUCKER: Yes.

DOBBS: All right. Thank you very much. Bill Tucker Well, our poll results tonight: 73 percent of you say the national media is biased in favor of Senator Barack Obama. Thanks for being with us tonight. Please join us here tomorrow. For all of us, we thank you for watching. Good night from New York.

LOU DOBBS TONIGHT,July 21, 2008

Since the May 12 ICE raid at the Agriprocessors Inc. plant in Postville, Iowa, Rep. Bruce Braley (D-1st) has been very busy voicing his concerns about this nation’s laughable immigration policy and workers safety.

In his initial response to the raid that netted about 400 workers, Braley said:

“If people have broken the law, there should be consequences. There’s a legal system in place to determine those consequences, and justice should be fairly imposed with due process. “

Yesssssss!

Braley continues:

“I’ll be interested to see if federal authorities will be bringing any charges against the employer. We know that the Swift Company never faced any charges after the raid in Marshalltown, and the enforcement of immigration violations against corporations has plummeted during the Bush administration. Until we enforce our immigration laws equally against both employers and employees who break the law, we will continue to have a problem with immigration.” (Italics mine.)

Way to go, congressman!

But if Braley is so gung-ho about strictly enforcing our immigration laws, why doesn’t it show up on his voting record provided by Americans for Better Immigration? (OK, so Braley hasn’t been around long enough to produce a complete picture of where he stands on the issue, but take a look at his grade on “interior enforcement.”)

Uh-oh. Maybe that explains why he hasn’t joined many of his House colleagues in cosponsoring the SAVE Act (H.R. 4088) that has at its center mandatory workplace verification.

Two calls to Todd Wolf, Braley’s legislative aide, asking why his boss wouldn’t support legislation dealing with the problems he says he’s concerned about, were not returned. I guess there’s a message here, and I’m thinking it means that Braley is not yet ready to hang out with those who put their money where their mouths are. That usually happens when politicians, you know, don’t want to turn off the corporate donations spigot and risk offending any number of “immigrant rights” organizations.